Bagaimana Ratifikasi Konvensi HAM Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia?

3
(198 votes)

Indonesia, as a signatory to numerous international human rights conventions, has undertaken the responsibility to uphold and implement these principles within its domestic legal framework. The process of ratifying these conventions signifies a commitment to aligning national policies with international human rights standards. This article delves into the intricate relationship between the ratification of human rights conventions and the subsequent impact on public policy in Indonesia.

The Significance of Ratification

Ratifying a human rights convention is a significant step for any nation, as it signifies a commitment to upholding the principles enshrined within the convention. In the context of Indonesia, the ratification of human rights conventions has served as a catalyst for the development and implementation of policies that promote and protect human rights. By ratifying these conventions, Indonesia has acknowledged the universality of human rights and its obligation to ensure that its citizens enjoy these rights.

The Impact on Domestic Legislation

The ratification of human rights conventions has a direct impact on domestic legislation. Indonesia is obligated to harmonize its national laws with the provisions of the ratified conventions. This process involves reviewing existing laws and amending or enacting new legislation to ensure consistency with international human rights standards. For instance, the ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) led to the enactment of Law No. 7 of 1984 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, which specifically addresses gender-based violence.

The Role of Judicial Review

The Indonesian judiciary plays a crucial role in ensuring the implementation of human rights conventions. The Constitutional Court, established in 2003, has the power to review laws and regulations for their conformity with the Constitution, including the provisions of ratified human rights conventions. This judicial review mechanism provides a mechanism for holding the government accountable for its obligations under international law.

The Influence on Public Policy

The ratification of human rights conventions has a profound influence on public policy in Indonesia. It has led to the development of policies aimed at promoting and protecting human rights in various sectors, including education, health, and social welfare. For example, the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) has influenced the development of policies related to child protection, education, and healthcare.

Challenges and Opportunities

While the ratification of human rights conventions has brought about positive changes in Indonesia, there are still challenges in fully implementing these conventions. These challenges include the need for greater awareness of human rights principles among the public and government officials, the lack of adequate resources for implementing human rights policies, and the persistence of cultural and societal norms that may conflict with international human rights standards.

Conclusion

The ratification of human rights conventions has had a significant impact on public policy in Indonesia. It has served as a catalyst for the development of legislation, judicial review mechanisms, and policies that promote and protect human rights. While challenges remain in fully implementing these conventions, the commitment to upholding international human rights standards is a crucial step towards building a more just and equitable society in Indonesia.