Analisis Kritis terhadap Jurnal De Jure: Kontribusi dan Tantangan

4
(211 votes)

The journal De Jure, a prominent legal publication in Indonesia, has played a significant role in shaping legal discourse and contributing to the development of Indonesian law. Its impact, however, is not without its challenges. This article provides a critical analysis of De Jure, examining its contributions and the obstacles it faces in fulfilling its mission.

De Jure's Contributions to Legal Discourse

De Jure has established itself as a platform for legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to engage in critical discussions on contemporary legal issues. The journal's commitment to publishing high-quality research articles, book reviews, and legal commentaries has fostered a vibrant intellectual environment within the Indonesian legal community. De Jure's articles often delve into complex legal problems, offering insightful analyses and proposing innovative solutions. This has contributed to a deeper understanding of legal principles and their application in the Indonesian context.

De Jure's Role in Legal Reform

De Jure has actively participated in the process of legal reform in Indonesia. The journal's articles have frequently addressed pressing legal issues, advocating for changes to existing laws and proposing new legislation. This engagement has influenced policymakers and contributed to the development of more effective and equitable legal frameworks. De Jure's influence can be seen in the adoption of several legal reforms, demonstrating its impact on shaping the legal landscape of Indonesia.

Challenges Facing De Jure

Despite its significant contributions, De Jure faces several challenges in fulfilling its mission. One major obstacle is the limited access to legal scholarship in Indonesia. The journal's readership is primarily confined to academics and legal professionals, hindering its reach to a wider audience. This limits the potential impact of De Jure's research and analysis on public discourse and legal awareness.

The Need for Greater Accessibility

Another challenge is the lack of accessibility to De Jure's content. While the journal is available online, its subscription-based model restricts access for many individuals and institutions. This limits the potential for De Jure to reach a broader audience and contribute to a more informed public discourse on legal issues.

Conclusion

De Jure has made significant contributions to legal discourse and legal reform in Indonesia. Its commitment to publishing high-quality research and its engagement with contemporary legal issues have fostered a vibrant intellectual environment and influenced legal policymaking. However, the journal faces challenges in terms of accessibility and reach, limiting its potential impact on public discourse and legal awareness. Addressing these challenges is crucial for De Jure to continue its vital role in shaping the legal landscape of Indonesia.