Peran Piagam Jakarta dalam Perumusan Pancasila

(282 votes)

The birth of Pancasila, the foundational ideology of Indonesia, was a complex and multifaceted process, shaped by various influences and debates. One crucial document that played a significant role in this process was the Jakarta Charter, known as the "Piagam Jakarta." This document, drafted during the Indonesian independence struggle, initially included a clause that reflected the influence of Islamic ideology. However, this clause sparked controversy and ultimately led to its removal, paving the way for the final formulation of Pancasila as we know it today. This article delves into the pivotal role of the Jakarta Charter in the formulation of Pancasila, exploring the context of its creation, the controversy surrounding its initial draft, and the eventual modifications that led to the final version of Pancasila. #### The Genesis of the Jakarta Charter The Jakarta Charter was drafted during the Preparatory Committee for Indonesian Independence (PPKI) meeting on June 22, 1945, in Jakarta. This meeting was convened to finalize the Indonesian constitution and establish the nation's guiding principles. The charter was a product of intense discussions and negotiations among various political and religious groups, each with their own vision for the future of Indonesia. The charter's initial draft reflected the influence of Islamic ideology, particularly the concept of "sharia" as a source of law. This clause, known as the "Jakarta Formula," stipulated that "the Indonesian state is based on belief in the One and Only God, with the obligation to carry out Islamic teachings in accordance with the Islamic Sharia for its adherents." #### The Controversy and Debate The inclusion of the "Jakarta Formula" sparked immediate controversy and debate. While some groups, particularly those with strong Islamic affiliations, supported the clause, others, including nationalist and secular groups, expressed strong opposition. They argued that the clause would create a discriminatory and unequal society, favoring Muslims over other religious groups. The debate intensified, threatening to derail the entire process of formulating a unified national ideology. #### The Removal of the "Jakarta Formula" The controversy surrounding the "Jakarta Formula" reached a critical point during the PPKI meeting on June 22, 1945. After intense discussions and negotiations, a compromise was reached. The "Jakarta Formula" was ultimately removed from the Jakarta Charter, and the final version of Pancasila was formulated. This revised version of Pancasila, consisting of five principles, emphasized the importance of belief in God, a just and civilized humanity, Indonesian national unity, democracy guided by wisdom in deliberation among representatives, and social justice for all Indonesians. #### The Significance of the Jakarta Charter The Jakarta Charter, despite the controversy surrounding its initial draft, played a crucial role in the formulation of Pancasila. It served as a platform for open debate and negotiation, allowing different groups to express their views and reach a compromise. The removal of the "Jakarta Formula" demonstrated the commitment of the founding fathers to a more inclusive and tolerant national ideology. It also highlighted the importance of accommodating diverse perspectives and finding common ground in the pursuit of national unity. The Jakarta Charter serves as a reminder of the complex and dynamic process that led to the formulation of Pancasila. It highlights the challenges and compromises involved in building a nation based on shared values and principles. While the initial draft of the charter reflected the influence of Islamic ideology, the final version of Pancasila, after the removal of the "Jakarta Formula," emerged as a more inclusive and unifying ideology, embracing the diversity of Indonesian society. The Jakarta Charter, therefore, stands as a testament to the ongoing process of national identity formation and the importance of dialogue and compromise in achieving national unity.