Perbandingan Rumusan Pancasila Soepomo dengan Versi Akhir

(340 votes)

Pancasila, the five principles that serve as the foundation of the Indonesian state, has undergone a complex and fascinating journey of development. From its initial conceptualization to its final formulation, the process involved numerous debates and revisions. One of the most prominent figures in this process was Soepomo, a renowned legal scholar and influential member of the Preparatory Committee for Indonesian Independence (PPKI). His proposed formulation of Pancasila, while ultimately not adopted, offers valuable insights into the evolution of this crucial national ideology. This article delves into the key differences between Soepomo's version of Pancasila and the final version adopted by the PPKI, highlighting the historical context and the underlying philosophical considerations. #### Soepomo's Vision of Pancasila Soepomo's formulation of Pancasila, presented during the PPKI's deliberations in June 1945, differed significantly from the final version. His version emphasized a more philosophical and abstract approach, focusing on the principles of "Gotong Royong" (mutual cooperation), "Keadilan Sosial" (social justice), "Ketuhanan" (divinity), "Kemanusiaan" (humanity), and "Persatuan" (unity). This emphasis on abstract principles aimed to create a framework for a just and equitable society, grounded in the values of cooperation and unity. #### The Final Version of Pancasila The final version of Pancasila, adopted by the PPKI on June 1, 1945, diverged from Soepomo's proposal in several key aspects. The final version, often referred to as the "Jakarta Charter," replaced "Ketuhanan" with "Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa" (belief in one God), reflecting the consensus reached among the committee members. This change aimed to accommodate the diverse religious beliefs within Indonesia while upholding the principle of religious tolerance. Additionally, the final version rearranged the order of the principles, placing "Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa" at the forefront, emphasizing the importance of religious belief in the Indonesian national identity. #### The Significance of the Differences The differences between Soepomo's version and the final version of Pancasila reflect the complex political and social dynamics of the time. Soepomo's emphasis on abstract principles aimed to create a unifying framework for a diverse nation, while the final version, with its focus on "Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa," sought to address the concerns of religious groups and ensure their inclusion in the national identity. This shift in emphasis highlights the importance of accommodating diverse perspectives and reaching a consensus in the process of nation-building. #### The Enduring Legacy of Pancasila Despite the differences in their formulations, both Soepomo's version and the final version of Pancasila share a common goal: to establish a just and equitable society based on the principles of cooperation, unity, and respect for human dignity. The final version of Pancasila, with its emphasis on "Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa," has become a cornerstone of Indonesian national identity, guiding the nation's political, social, and cultural development. The legacy of Soepomo's version, however, remains significant, offering valuable insights into the evolution of Pancasila and the ongoing debate surrounding its interpretation and application. The differences between Soepomo's version and the final version of Pancasila highlight the dynamic and evolving nature of national ideologies. While the final version has become the official embodiment of Indonesian values, Soepomo's contribution remains significant, offering a valuable perspective on the historical context and the philosophical considerations that shaped the development of this crucial national ideology.