Interpelasi vs. Angket: Perbandingan Mekanisme Pengawasan DPR

(238 votes)

The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) plays a crucial role in overseeing the government's performance. To ensure accountability and transparency, the DPR employs various mechanisms, including interpelasi and angket. Both mechanisms serve as tools for the DPR to scrutinize the government's actions, but they differ in their scope, purpose, and procedures. This article delves into the intricacies of interpelasi and angket, highlighting their distinct features and providing a comprehensive comparison of these two important mechanisms of parliamentary oversight. #### Understanding Interpelasi Interpelasi, often translated as "interpellation," is a formal mechanism used by the DPR to seek clarification from the government on a specific issue of national importance. It is a powerful tool that allows the DPR to demand explanations and accountability from the government regarding its policies, actions, or decisions. The initiation of interpelasi requires a minimum of one-third of the total DPR members to sign a proposal, demonstrating a significant level of concern within the legislature. Once the proposal is submitted, the DPR Speaker will then decide whether to proceed with the interpelasi process. #### The Purpose of Interpelasi The primary purpose of interpelasi is to obtain detailed information and explanations from the government regarding a specific issue. It is not intended to censure or remove the government from power. Instead, it aims to ensure transparency and accountability by allowing the DPR to scrutinize the government's actions and hold it responsible for its decisions. Interpelasi can be used to address a wide range of issues, including economic policies, social programs, foreign affairs, and national security. #### Understanding Angket Angket, often translated as "questionnaire," is another mechanism used by the DPR to gather information and conduct investigations. Unlike interpelasi, which focuses on seeking explanations from the government, angket aims to gather information from various sources, including government officials, experts, and the public. The DPR can initiate an angket to investigate a specific issue or to gather information on a broader topic of national interest. #### The Purpose of Angket The primary purpose of angket is to gather information and conduct investigations. It is a tool for the DPR to gather evidence and data to support its oversight function. Angket can be used to investigate allegations of corruption, human rights violations, or other issues of public concern. The results of an angket can be used to inform the DPR's decision-making process and to hold the government accountable for its actions. #### Key Differences Between Interpelasi and Angket The key difference between interpelasi and angket lies in their scope and purpose. Interpelasi is a mechanism for seeking explanations from the government, while angket is a tool for gathering information and conducting investigations. Interpelasi is initiated by the DPR, while angket can be initiated by the DPR or by a specific commission within the DPR. Interpelasi is typically used to address specific issues, while angket can be used to investigate broader topics. #### Conclusion Interpelasi and angket are two important mechanisms used by the DPR to oversee the government's performance. While both mechanisms serve as tools for the DPR to scrutinize the government's actions, they differ in their scope, purpose, and procedures. Interpelasi is a powerful tool for seeking explanations and accountability from the government, while angket is a mechanism for gathering information and conducting investigations. Both mechanisms play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in the Indonesian political system.