Identitas Nasional dan Perdebatan Sebutan Negara Myanmar

(225 votes)

The question of what to call the country formerly known as Burma has become a point of contention, with the debate reflecting deeper issues of national identity and political change. While the official name of the country is now the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, many people, particularly those advocating for the Rohingya Muslim minority, continue to use the term "Burma." This article delves into the complexities surrounding the name change and the ongoing debate, exploring the historical, political, and cultural factors at play. #### The Shift from Burma to Myanmar The name change from Burma to Myanmar was officially adopted in 1989 by the military junta that seized power in 1962. The junta argued that the term "Myanmar" was more accurate and reflected the country's diverse ethnicities. The Burmese language, spoken by the majority Bamar ethnic group, refers to the country as "Myanma," while the term "Burma" is derived from the British colonial administration. The junta's decision was seen by many as an attempt to assert its authority and legitimize its rule, while also seeking to erase the legacy of colonial influence. #### The Debate Over the Name The name change has been met with mixed reactions. While some, particularly within the Bamar majority, support the use of "Myanmar" as a symbol of national unity and a break from the colonial past, others, including many members of the Rohingya community and international organizations, continue to use "Burma." They argue that the name change was imposed by a repressive regime and that it serves to marginalize minority groups. The use of "Burma" is seen as a way to acknowledge the country's history and to express solidarity with those who have been subjected to persecution and discrimination. #### The Rohingya Perspective The Rohingya community, a Muslim minority group that has faced systematic persecution and violence in Myanmar, has been particularly vocal in their opposition to the name change. They argue that the term "Myanmar" is associated with the military junta and its policies of ethnic cleansing and genocide. The Rohingya see the use of "Burma" as a way to reclaim their history and identity, which has been systematically erased by the Burmese government. #### The International Community's Stance The international community has been divided on the issue of the name change. Some countries and organizations have adopted the official name "Myanmar," while others continue to use "Burma." The United Nations, for example, uses "Myanmar" in its official documents, but many human rights organizations and advocacy groups continue to use "Burma" to highlight the ongoing human rights abuses in the country. #### The Future of the Debate The debate over the name of Myanmar is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. The issue is deeply intertwined with the country's political and social landscape, reflecting the ongoing struggle for power, identity, and recognition. As Myanmar transitions towards a more democratic future, the question of what to call the country will remain a sensitive and contentious issue. The debate over the name of Myanmar highlights the complexities of national identity and the challenges of reconciling historical grievances with the aspirations for a more inclusive and equitable future. While the official name of the country is "Myanmar," the ongoing use of "Burma" by many, particularly those advocating for the Rohingya community, reflects the deep divisions and unresolved issues that continue to plague the country. The future of the debate will depend on the willingness of all parties to engage in dialogue and to find common ground based on respect for diversity and human rights.