Analisis Yuridis Pasal 26 Ayat 2 UUD 1945: Implikasi bagi Kebebasan Beragama

(300 votes)

The Indonesian Constitution, enshrined in the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms for its citizens, including the right to freedom of religion. This right is explicitly stated in Article 29 of the Constitution, which recognizes the freedom of every citizen to embrace any religion and to worship according to their respective beliefs. However, Article 26, paragraph 2, of the Constitution introduces a caveat to this freedom, stating that "the Government shall regulate the implementation of religious teachings in accordance with the principles of the Indonesian state." This provision has sparked debate and raised concerns regarding the potential for government interference in religious practices and the implications for freedom of religion in Indonesia. This article delves into the legal analysis of Article 26, paragraph 2, of the UUD 1945, examining its implications for freedom of religion in Indonesia. #### Examining the Legal Framework Article 26, paragraph 2, of the UUD 1945 grants the government the authority to regulate the implementation of religious teachings. This provision has been interpreted by some as a justification for government intervention in religious affairs, potentially limiting the freedom of religious communities to practice their beliefs without undue interference. The government's role in regulating religious teachings is further elaborated in Law No. 2 of 1989 concerning Religious Harmony, which outlines the government's responsibility to ensure that religious teachings are conducted in accordance with the principles of the Indonesian state. This law has been criticized for its potential to stifle religious expression and promote religious intolerance. #### The Principle of Pancasila and Religious Harmony The Indonesian state is founded on the principles of Pancasila, which emphasizes the values of belief in one God, humanity, unity, democracy, and social justice. These principles are considered to be the foundation of the Indonesian nation and are often invoked as justification for government intervention in religious affairs. The government argues that its role in regulating religious teachings is necessary to ensure that religious practices remain in line with the principles of Pancasila and promote religious harmony within society. However, critics argue that this approach can lead to the suppression of minority religious groups and the imposition of a dominant religious ideology. #### The Right to Freedom of Religion and the Role of the State The right to freedom of religion is a fundamental human right recognized by international law and enshrined in the Indonesian Constitution. This right encompasses the freedom to change one's religion or belief, the freedom to manifest one's religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice, and observance, and the freedom to establish and maintain religious institutions. While the government has a legitimate interest in promoting religious harmony and ensuring that religious practices do not violate public order, this interest must be balanced against the fundamental right to freedom of religion. #### The Implications for Religious Minorities Article 26, paragraph 2, of the UUD 1945 and the subsequent legislation have raised concerns about the potential for discrimination and persecution against religious minorities in Indonesia. The government's authority to regulate religious teachings has been used to restrict the activities of minority religious groups, including the denial of permits for religious gatherings, the closure of places of worship, and the prosecution of individuals for practicing their faith. These actions have created a climate of fear and uncertainty for religious minorities, who often feel marginalized and vulnerable. #### Conclusion Article 26, paragraph 2, of the UUD 1945 presents a complex legal framework that raises significant questions about the balance between the government's role in regulating religious teachings and the fundamental right to freedom of religion. While the government has a legitimate interest in promoting religious harmony and ensuring public order, its actions must be carefully scrutinized to ensure that they do not infringe upon the rights of religious minorities. The government's approach to regulating religious teachings should be based on principles of tolerance, inclusivity, and respect for religious diversity. It is crucial to ensure that the implementation of Article 26, paragraph 2, does not lead to the suppression of religious expression or the marginalization of religious minorities. The Indonesian government must uphold its commitment to protecting the fundamental right to freedom of religion for all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs.