Dampak Ekonomi Orde Baru: Pertumbuhan dan Ketimpangan

4
(159 votes)

The New Order era in Indonesia, spanning from 1966 to 1998, witnessed significant economic growth fueled by a combination of government policies and global economic trends. This period saw a dramatic shift from the turbulent years of the Sukarno regime to a more stable and prosperous era. However, the economic prosperity of the New Order came at a cost, with a widening gap between the rich and the poor. This article delves into the economic impact of the New Order, exploring the factors that contributed to its growth and the social inequalities that emerged as a consequence. <br/ > <br/ >#### The Rise of the Indonesian Economy <br/ > <br/ >The New Order government, under the leadership of President Suharto, implemented a series of economic reforms aimed at stabilizing the economy and promoting growth. These reforms included a focus on export-oriented industries, attracting foreign investment, and promoting infrastructure development. The government also adopted a more market-oriented approach, reducing state intervention in the economy. These policies, coupled with favorable global economic conditions, led to a period of sustained economic growth. The Indonesian economy experienced an average annual growth rate of over 7% during the 1970s and 1980s, transforming the country from a predominantly agrarian society to a more industrialized one. This growth was driven by the expansion of industries such as oil and gas, textiles, and manufacturing. The government's focus on infrastructure development, including roads, ports, and airports, facilitated trade and investment, further contributing to economic growth. <br/ > <br/ >#### The Shadow of Inequality <br/ > <br/ >While the New Order era witnessed impressive economic growth, it also saw a significant increase in income inequality. The benefits of economic growth were not evenly distributed, with a small elite accumulating wealth while the majority of the population remained relatively poor. The government's focus on export-oriented industries and foreign investment led to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few, while the majority of the population remained engaged in low-paying jobs in the agricultural sector. The government's policies also favored large corporations and conglomerates, further exacerbating income inequality. The lack of access to education and healthcare for the majority of the population also contributed to the widening gap between the rich and the poor. <br/ > <br/ >#### The Legacy of the New Order <br/ > <br/ >The economic legacy of the New Order is a complex one. While the period saw significant economic growth, it also witnessed a rise in inequality and a lack of sustainable development. The government's focus on short-term economic growth at the expense of social equity and environmental sustainability had long-term consequences. The economic policies of the New Order, while contributing to growth, also laid the foundation for the economic and social challenges that Indonesia faces today. The country's economic growth was largely driven by the exploitation of natural resources, leading to environmental degradation and unsustainable practices. The lack of investment in human capital and social welfare programs also contributed to the persistence of poverty and inequality. <br/ > <br/ >The New Order era in Indonesia was a period of significant economic growth, but it also saw a widening gap between the rich and the poor. The government's policies, while contributing to economic growth, also exacerbated inequality and laid the foundation for the economic and social challenges that Indonesia faces today. The legacy of the New Order serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing economic growth with social equity and environmental sustainability. <br/ >