Menganalisis Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Praktik Hiwalah di Indonesia

4
(247 votes)

The concept of justice and legal certainty is paramount in any legal system. In the Indonesian context, the practice of *hiwalah*, a form of debt transfer, has been a subject of debate regarding its alignment with these principles. This article delves into the intricacies of *hiwalah* in Indonesia, analyzing its potential to uphold justice and legal certainty.

Understanding Hiwalah in the Indonesian Legal Framework

*Hiwalah* is a legal concept rooted in Islamic law, specifically in the field of *muamalah* (transactions). It involves the transfer of a debt obligation from one party (the debtor) to another (the new debtor) with the consent of both parties. In Indonesia, *hiwalah* is recognized as a valid form of debt transfer, governed by both Islamic law and the Indonesian Civil Code. However, the application of *hiwalah* in practice has raised concerns about its potential to undermine justice and legal certainty.

Challenges to Justice and Legal Certainty in Hiwalah

One of the primary concerns surrounding *hiwalah* is the potential for abuse. In some cases, *hiwalah* can be used as a tool for debt collection, where the new debtor may be pressured or coerced into assuming the debt. This can lead to situations where the original debtor is relieved of their financial responsibility, while the new debtor is left burdened with an unfair debt. Furthermore, the lack of clear regulations governing the process of *hiwalah* can create ambiguity and uncertainty, making it difficult to determine the validity and enforceability of the debt transfer.

Ensuring Justice and Legal Certainty in Hiwalah

To address these concerns, it is crucial to establish clear guidelines and regulations for the practice of *hiwalah*. This includes defining the conditions under which *hiwalah* is permissible, ensuring transparency and fairness in the transfer process, and providing mechanisms for dispute resolution. Additionally, raising awareness among the public about the potential risks and implications of *hiwalah* is essential.

Conclusion

The practice of *hiwalah* in Indonesia presents both opportunities and challenges in relation to justice and legal certainty. While it can be a legitimate tool for debt transfer, its potential for abuse and the lack of clear regulations require careful consideration. By establishing clear guidelines, promoting transparency, and raising public awareness, Indonesia can ensure that *hiwalah* is practiced in a manner that upholds justice and legal certainty for all parties involved.