Menurut Clarkson dan Hill, isu yang berkenaan pertanyaan ketentuan mana yang akan diberlakukai dalam kasus yang diperiksa isu __ A. Jurisdiction B. Choice of law C. The law of the forum D. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements

A

The question pertains to issues related to "forum non conveniens," which is a doctrine allowing a court to dismiss a case if another court, or forum, is more appropriate for the dispute. The options provided relate to different legal concepts:1. **Jurisdiction**: This refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide a case. It is the most relevant to the concept of forum non conveniens, as it deals with the appropriateness of the forum (court) where a case is being heard. 2. **Choice of law**: This refers to the legal principle that allows parties to a contract to choose the law that will govern their contractual relationship. While it is related to international transactions, it is not directly about the appropriateness of the forum.3. **The law of the forum**: This refers to the law that applies in the court where a case is being heard. While it is related to forum non conveniens, it is not the primary issue. The primary issue is whether the forum is appropriate, which is covered under jurisdiction.4. **Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments**: This refers to the legal process by which a court in one jurisdiction recognizes and enforces the judgment of a court in another jurisdiction. While it is related to international transactions, it is not directly about the appropriateness of the forum.Therefore, the most appropriate answer is "A. Jurisdiction," as it directly relates to the issue of which forum is appropriate to hear a case, which is the essence of the doctrine of forum non conveniens.