Pengaruh Kliping Orde Baru terhadap Pembentukan Identitas Nasional

The era of the New Order in Indonesia, spanning from 1966 to 1998, was marked by a strong emphasis on national identity formation. This period witnessed the rise of a powerful state apparatus that sought to cultivate a unified national identity, one that resonated with the ideals of Pancasila and the values of a modern, progressive Indonesia. A key instrument in this endeavor was the use of "kliping," a form of media censorship that heavily influenced the information landscape and, consequently, the shaping of national identity. This article delves into the profound impact of "kliping" during the New Order era, exploring how this practice shaped the collective understanding of Indonesian history, culture, and national identity.

The Power of "Kliping" in Shaping Narratives

"Kliping" was a systematic practice of censorship employed by the New Order government to control the flow of information and shape public discourse. This involved the selective editing or outright removal of content from newspapers, magazines, and other media outlets deemed detrimental to the regime's narrative. The government's control over information dissemination was extensive, reaching even into the realm of academic publications and cultural productions. This practice effectively created a filtered reality, where the public was exposed to a carefully curated version of events and narratives that aligned with the government's agenda.

The Construction of a Unified National Identity

The "kliping" practice played a crucial role in constructing a unified national identity that emphasized the values of unity, stability, and development. By controlling the information flow, the government could promote its own version of history, culture, and national identity. This involved highlighting the achievements of the New Order regime, emphasizing the importance of national unity, and suppressing dissenting voices or alternative perspectives. The "kliping" practice effectively silenced critical voices and marginalized alternative narratives, contributing to the creation of a monolithic national identity that reflected the government's ideology.

The Impact on Historical Narratives

The "kliping" practice had a profound impact on the understanding of Indonesian history. By controlling the information flow, the government could shape the historical narrative to its advantage. This involved emphasizing the achievements of the New Order regime, while downplaying or suppressing the atrocities committed during the 1965-1966 period. The "kliping" practice effectively created a sanitized version of history, one that served the interests of the regime and contributed to the formation of a national identity that was based on a selective and distorted understanding of the past.

The Legacy of "Kliping"

The legacy of "kliping" continues to influence the understanding of Indonesian history and national identity. The practice of censorship, while less overt than during the New Order era, still exists in various forms. The control over information flow, whether through media ownership, online censorship, or the spread of misinformation, continues to shape the public discourse and influence the formation of national identity. The "kliping" practice serves as a reminder of the power of information control and its impact on shaping collective narratives and identities.

The "kliping" practice during the New Order era had a profound impact on the formation of national identity in Indonesia. By controlling the flow of information, the government was able to shape the historical narrative, promote its own ideology, and suppress dissenting voices. This practice created a filtered reality that contributed to the construction of a unified national identity that reflected the government's agenda. While the "kliping" practice is no longer as prevalent as it was during the New Order era, its legacy continues to influence the understanding of Indonesian history and national identity. The control over information flow, whether through media ownership, online censorship, or the spread of misinformation, remains a powerful tool for shaping public discourse and influencing the formation of national identity.