là customers are unable to finish the meals. Similarly restaurants can of half portions or allow customers order side dishes rather than f meals, to reduce the amount of foc that is wasted. Adapted fromhttps //moveforhunger.o The similarity between both texts is A environmental consequences of both texts discuss the A food waste. B both texts present the economic B costs associated with wasted food. C concept of "food loss and "food both texts distinguish between the wastage".

Question

Pertanyaan

là customers are unable to finish the meals. Similarly restaurants can of half portions or allow customers order side dishes rather than f meals, to reduce the amount of foc that is wasted. Adapted fromhttps //moveforhunger.o The similarity between both texts is A environmental consequences of both texts discuss the A food waste. B both texts present the economic B costs associated with wasted food. C concept of "food loss and "food both texts distinguish between the wastage".

Tampilkan lebih banyak

Answer 1

C. Konsep "food loss" dan "food wastage".

Answer 2

**
Baik teks pertama maupun kedua membahas tentang masalah limbah makanan (food waste) dan kehilangan makanan (food loss). Teks pertama menyebutkan tentang restoran yang menawarkan porsi setengah atau memungkinkan pelanggan memesan hidangan sampingan untuk mengurangi jumlah makanan yang terbuang. Ini menunjukkan upaya untuk mengurangi "food waste". Teks kedua secara eksplisit membahas tentang konsep "food loss" dan "food wastage". Oleh karena itu, kesamaan antara kedua teks adalah konsep "food loss" dan "food wastage".

Pertanyaan

Jawaban

Penjelasan

Pertanyaan Panas lebih